DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 §. COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1007
ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490
BAN
Docket: 07397-12
20) November 2012
¢ Correction of Naval Records
Chairman, Board fo
From:
To: secretary of the Navy
sub}: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD 1 _ EY
Ref: (a) Title 16 U.S. 1552
Encl 1) DD Form 149 w/attachments
Command (NPC) memo 1430 Ser B12/0548
(a) Petitioner filed
in effect, that the
ow that Petitioner's
ination,
of reference
requesting,
ted to sh
rve advancement exam
(1) with this Board
enclosure
be correc
applicable naval record
August 2009 E-6/HML Navy-wide Rese
cycle 085 be revalidated.
zealman, George and
of error and
t to its regula
action indicated below should be
Documentary material
f the enclosures, naval
policies.
f{ Messrs.
r's allegations
nd, pursuan
9. The Board, consisting °
‘oios reviewed Petitione
injustice on 19 November 2012 a
determined th
taken on the available
considered by the Board consisted ©
yecords , and applicable statutes, regulations and
of record
ed all the facts
r and injustice,
3, The Board, having review
pertaining to Petitioner's allegations of erro
finds as follows:
4 si exhausted all
o this Board, Peti
lable under exis
nt of the Navy-
Before applying t
e remedies aval
ithin the Departme
A
administrativ
regulations W
(2), the office
s enclosure
ondence attached a
cter addressed in
b. In corresp
having cognizance over the subject ma
Petitioner's application has commented to the effect that the
request has merit and warrants favorable action.
CONCLUSION
4 of record, and
Upon review and considerat!
especially in
finds the exi
corrective action.
RECOMMENDATION:
where appropriate,
as follows:
August 2009 Navy-wide Reserve advancement
a. Petitioner's
E-6/HM1 be revalidated.
examination, cycle 085 for
b. That a copy of this Report of Proceedings be filed in
Petitioner's naval record.
) of the revised Procedures of the
& Pursuant to Se
Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal
(c)) it 1s certified that quorum was
Regulations,
and that the
present at the Board's review an
foregoing is a true and complete
proceedings in the abov
ROBERT D. 7 SALMAN DAV IT, CASH
KEE Recorder
Recorder
Bs Pursuant to the delegation
6(e) of the revised procedures of the Board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723 6 (e))
it is hereby
ts provisions,
ion, ta
and having assured compliance with 1
ed by the Board on
announced that the foregoing corrective act
authority of reference (a), has been approv
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.
20 November 2012
“ Datta 4. (Caza
JONATHAN es, RUSKIN
Executive Director
Acting
ken under the
rn
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 06079-11
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 BAN Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to validate her E-6/YN1 Navy-wide advancement examinations and show that that her E-6/YN1 examinations from September 2008 through September 2010 be validated and receive PNA points to be applied to her March 2011 exam. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 00712-11
The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 3 October 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. g. Upon being notified of the deficiency in his clearance status in December 2010, Petitioner re-submitted the required security questionnaire documents to obtain the required security clearance. He had advanced...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 10262 11
The Board, consisting of Messrs. pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 25 June 2012 and, pursuant to 4ts regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be teken on the available evidence of record. In March 2011, after being notified of the deficiency in his clearance status, Petitioner re-submitted the required security questionnaire documents to obtain the required security clearance. VOZ62-12 that Petitioner...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 00379 12
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to validate his E-4/HT3 Navy-wide advancement examination and show that he met the criteria to be advanced to E-4/HT3 from the September 2010 advancement cycle. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 12 March 2012 and, pursuant to its regulations,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 11700 11
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 §. The Board also considered enclosure (2) which is a recommendation from the Navy Personnel Command (NPC) Code 811 (Career Progression Department) that no relief be granted. g. In April 2011, after being notified of the deficiency in his clearance status, Petitioner re-submitted the required security questionnaire documents to obtain the required security clearance.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 11653 11
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to validate his E-4/MC3 Navy-wide advancement examination and show that he met the criteria to be advanced to E-4/MC3 from the September 2010 advancement cycle. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 12 March 2012 and, pursuant to its regulations,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 10656 11
Under BUPERINST 1430.16F, (Advancement Manual for Enlisted Personnel of the U.S. Navy and U.S. Navy Reserve), all personnel designated in certain ratings, including Petitioner’s rating, “must maintain, as a minimum, continuous security clearance eligibility.” This provision has been interpreted by NPC to mean that, in order to be eligible to participate in an advancement cycle, take an advancement exam or advance to the next highest grade, a Sailor in one of the designated ratings must hold...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 07085-10
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 BAN Docket No. In September 2010, with his final adjudicated clearance, he participated in the E6/AE1 Navy-wide advancement examination and was selected and advanced with an effective date of 16 June 2011. j. Petitioner has applied to this Board seeking to have his E6/AE1 advancement exams validated retroactively for PNA points to apply toward his September 2009 advancement exam. NPC and CNO...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 03866-11
f. In September 2010, Petitioner participated in the E-5/A02 advancement exam again. g. Upon being notified of the deficiency in her clearance status, in February 2011, Petitioner re-submitted the required security questionnaire documents to obtain the required security clearance. She had advanced from E-1 to E-4.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 11652 11
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to validate his E-4/MC3 Navy-wide advancement examination and show that he met the criteria to be advanced to E-4/MC3 from the September 2010 advancement cycle. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 12 March 2012 and, pursuant to its regulations,...